More insights.
Subscribe to our newsletter.
Deep dives into design thinking, creative process, and the intersection of business and aesthetics.
A rebrand is successful when customers feel more certain, not more surprised.
There is a dangerous misconception in the boardroom that rebranding is a creative exercise. Business leaders often view it as a chance to "shake things up," to express a new vibe, or simply to cure their own boredom with their current logo.
This is a reckless approach.
Rebranding is not about creativity; it is about risk management. It is a commercial surgery designed to fix a specific dysfunction in your business. When you change your face to the market, you are risking your recognition, your search equity, and your existing customer trust.
You should never take that risk for the sake of aesthetics. You should only take it to solve a problem that is costing you money.
The only reason to rebrand
If your current brand is ugly but effective—if it brings in the right leads at the right price—do not touch it. "Ugly" is subjective; "Profitable" is objective.
We only recommend a rebrand when the current identity has become a liability. It is a commercial fix, not an artistic one. The goal is to increase clarity (so people understand what you do faster), trust (so they believe you can do it), and pricing power (so you can charge what you are worth).
If you are rebranding because you "just want a change," buy a new office chair. Leave the company assets alone.
The seven signals your brand is costing you money
How do you know if you actually need to do this? We look for seven specific signals of brand decay. If you recognize three or more of these, your brand is acting as a brake on your growth.
Wrong Enquiries: You are a premium consultant, but you keep getting leads looking for cheap execution. Your brand is signaling "budget" even if your proposals signal "premium."
Constant Discounting: Clients flinch at your price because the "wrapper" (your brand) doesn't look like it contains a high-value product.
Unclear Category Fit: People constantly ask, "So, do you do X?" or "Are you like [Competitor Y]?" Your brand is failing to position you correctly.
Embarrassment: Your sales team hesitates to send the website URL because it doesn't reflect the quality of the pitch they just delivered.
Inconsistent Messaging: You say one thing on LinkedIn, another on the homepage, and a third thing in the deck.
Generic Visuals: You look exactly like your competitors. If you swapped logos, nobody would notice.
Sales Cycle Drag: It takes too long to explain what you do. A good brand explains 80% of the value proposition before the call starts.
Refresh vs. Reposition vs. Rebrand
Precision matters. You rarely need to burn the house down.
A Refresh (The Haircut): You keep the logo and the name, but you tidy up the typography, expand the colour palette, and fix the inconsistencies. This is low risk, high reward. It modernises you without losing recognition.
A Repositioning (The New Job): You keep the visual assets, but you change the narrative. You shift from selling "IT Support" to selling "Cybersecurity Strategy." The logo stays, but the headline changes.
A Rebrand (Witness Protection): This is the nuclear option. New name, new logo, new identity. This is only necessary if the current brand is toxic, legally compromised, or fundamentally misaligned with the future of the company.
What you must protect at all costs
The biggest mistake agencies make is throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
When Tropicana rebranded their orange juice packaging a few years ago, they made it look "cleaner" and "modern." They also removed the iconic orange with the straw in it. Sales collapsed by 20% in weeks because customers couldn't find the product on the shelf. They lost their distinctive assets.
Before we change a pixel, we audit what needs to be protected.
Recognition Assets: Is there a colour, a shape, or a phrase that your market uses to identify you? Keep it.
Search Equity: If you change your name or domain, you risk nuking your SEO history. This must be managed with military precision (301 redirects, schema updates).
Customer Confidence: Your existing clients need to know you haven't been bought out or changed management.
The process that prevents internal politics
Rebranding projects often die in the "I don't like blue" phase.
Subjective opinions are the enemy of effective branding. To prevent internal politics, we move the conversation from "Taste" to "Performance."
We do not ask: "Do you like this design?" We ask: "Does this design differentiate us from Competitor X? Does it appeal to Persona Y? Is it legible on mobile?"
By establishing clear success metrics upfront, we remove the ego. The Creative Director isn't guessing; they are executing a strategy that everyone agreed on.
Launch without losing momentum
A rebrand is a shock to the system. You need to manage the transition so you don't confuse your loyalists.
Sequence your launch. Do not just flip a switch.
The Website: This is the source of truth. It goes first.
The Touchpoints: Update your invoices, email signatures, and proposals. These are the boring items that build trust.
The Campaign: Only after the foundation is solid do you shout about it on LinkedIn.
A successful rebrand shouldn't feel like a surprise party. It should feel like an evolution—the inevitable next step for a company that has outgrown its old skin.
A rebrand is successful when customers feel more certain, not more surprised.
There is a dangerous misconception in the boardroom that rebranding is a creative exercise. Business leaders often view it as a chance to "shake things up," to express a new vibe, or simply to cure their own boredom with their current logo.
This is a reckless approach.
Rebranding is not about creativity; it is about risk management. It is a commercial surgery designed to fix a specific dysfunction in your business. When you change your face to the market, you are risking your recognition, your search equity, and your existing customer trust.
You should never take that risk for the sake of aesthetics. You should only take it to solve a problem that is costing you money.
The only reason to rebrand
If your current brand is ugly but effective—if it brings in the right leads at the right price—do not touch it. "Ugly" is subjective; "Profitable" is objective.
We only recommend a rebrand when the current identity has become a liability. It is a commercial fix, not an artistic one. The goal is to increase clarity (so people understand what you do faster), trust (so they believe you can do it), and pricing power (so you can charge what you are worth).
If you are rebranding because you "just want a change," buy a new office chair. Leave the company assets alone.
The seven signals your brand is costing you money
How do you know if you actually need to do this? We look for seven specific signals of brand decay. If you recognize three or more of these, your brand is acting as a brake on your growth.
Wrong Enquiries: You are a premium consultant, but you keep getting leads looking for cheap execution. Your brand is signaling "budget" even if your proposals signal "premium."
Constant Discounting: Clients flinch at your price because the "wrapper" (your brand) doesn't look like it contains a high-value product.
Unclear Category Fit: People constantly ask, "So, do you do X?" or "Are you like [Competitor Y]?" Your brand is failing to position you correctly.
Embarrassment: Your sales team hesitates to send the website URL because it doesn't reflect the quality of the pitch they just delivered.
Inconsistent Messaging: You say one thing on LinkedIn, another on the homepage, and a third thing in the deck.
Generic Visuals: You look exactly like your competitors. If you swapped logos, nobody would notice.
Sales Cycle Drag: It takes too long to explain what you do. A good brand explains 80% of the value proposition before the call starts.
Refresh vs. Reposition vs. Rebrand
Precision matters. You rarely need to burn the house down.
A Refresh (The Haircut): You keep the logo and the name, but you tidy up the typography, expand the colour palette, and fix the inconsistencies. This is low risk, high reward. It modernises you without losing recognition.
A Repositioning (The New Job): You keep the visual assets, but you change the narrative. You shift from selling "IT Support" to selling "Cybersecurity Strategy." The logo stays, but the headline changes.
A Rebrand (Witness Protection): This is the nuclear option. New name, new logo, new identity. This is only necessary if the current brand is toxic, legally compromised, or fundamentally misaligned with the future of the company.
What you must protect at all costs
The biggest mistake agencies make is throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
When Tropicana rebranded their orange juice packaging a few years ago, they made it look "cleaner" and "modern." They also removed the iconic orange with the straw in it. Sales collapsed by 20% in weeks because customers couldn't find the product on the shelf. They lost their distinctive assets.
Before we change a pixel, we audit what needs to be protected.
Recognition Assets: Is there a colour, a shape, or a phrase that your market uses to identify you? Keep it.
Search Equity: If you change your name or domain, you risk nuking your SEO history. This must be managed with military precision (301 redirects, schema updates).
Customer Confidence: Your existing clients need to know you haven't been bought out or changed management.
The process that prevents internal politics
Rebranding projects often die in the "I don't like blue" phase.
Subjective opinions are the enemy of effective branding. To prevent internal politics, we move the conversation from "Taste" to "Performance."
We do not ask: "Do you like this design?" We ask: "Does this design differentiate us from Competitor X? Does it appeal to Persona Y? Is it legible on mobile?"
By establishing clear success metrics upfront, we remove the ego. The Creative Director isn't guessing; they are executing a strategy that everyone agreed on.
Launch without losing momentum
A rebrand is a shock to the system. You need to manage the transition so you don't confuse your loyalists.
Sequence your launch. Do not just flip a switch.
The Website: This is the source of truth. It goes first.
The Touchpoints: Update your invoices, email signatures, and proposals. These are the boring items that build trust.
The Campaign: Only after the foundation is solid do you shout about it on LinkedIn.
A successful rebrand shouldn't feel like a surprise party. It should feel like an evolution—the inevitable next step for a company that has outgrown its old skin.
A rebrand is successful when customers feel more certain, not more surprised.
There is a dangerous misconception in the boardroom that rebranding is a creative exercise. Business leaders often view it as a chance to "shake things up," to express a new vibe, or simply to cure their own boredom with their current logo.
This is a reckless approach.
Rebranding is not about creativity; it is about risk management. It is a commercial surgery designed to fix a specific dysfunction in your business. When you change your face to the market, you are risking your recognition, your search equity, and your existing customer trust.
You should never take that risk for the sake of aesthetics. You should only take it to solve a problem that is costing you money.
The only reason to rebrand
If your current brand is ugly but effective—if it brings in the right leads at the right price—do not touch it. "Ugly" is subjective; "Profitable" is objective.
We only recommend a rebrand when the current identity has become a liability. It is a commercial fix, not an artistic one. The goal is to increase clarity (so people understand what you do faster), trust (so they believe you can do it), and pricing power (so you can charge what you are worth).
If you are rebranding because you "just want a change," buy a new office chair. Leave the company assets alone.
The seven signals your brand is costing you money
How do you know if you actually need to do this? We look for seven specific signals of brand decay. If you recognize three or more of these, your brand is acting as a brake on your growth.
Wrong Enquiries: You are a premium consultant, but you keep getting leads looking for cheap execution. Your brand is signaling "budget" even if your proposals signal "premium."
Constant Discounting: Clients flinch at your price because the "wrapper" (your brand) doesn't look like it contains a high-value product.
Unclear Category Fit: People constantly ask, "So, do you do X?" or "Are you like [Competitor Y]?" Your brand is failing to position you correctly.
Embarrassment: Your sales team hesitates to send the website URL because it doesn't reflect the quality of the pitch they just delivered.
Inconsistent Messaging: You say one thing on LinkedIn, another on the homepage, and a third thing in the deck.
Generic Visuals: You look exactly like your competitors. If you swapped logos, nobody would notice.
Sales Cycle Drag: It takes too long to explain what you do. A good brand explains 80% of the value proposition before the call starts.
Refresh vs. Reposition vs. Rebrand
Precision matters. You rarely need to burn the house down.
A Refresh (The Haircut): You keep the logo and the name, but you tidy up the typography, expand the colour palette, and fix the inconsistencies. This is low risk, high reward. It modernises you without losing recognition.
A Repositioning (The New Job): You keep the visual assets, but you change the narrative. You shift from selling "IT Support" to selling "Cybersecurity Strategy." The logo stays, but the headline changes.
A Rebrand (Witness Protection): This is the nuclear option. New name, new logo, new identity. This is only necessary if the current brand is toxic, legally compromised, or fundamentally misaligned with the future of the company.
What you must protect at all costs
The biggest mistake agencies make is throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
When Tropicana rebranded their orange juice packaging a few years ago, they made it look "cleaner" and "modern." They also removed the iconic orange with the straw in it. Sales collapsed by 20% in weeks because customers couldn't find the product on the shelf. They lost their distinctive assets.
Before we change a pixel, we audit what needs to be protected.
Recognition Assets: Is there a colour, a shape, or a phrase that your market uses to identify you? Keep it.
Search Equity: If you change your name or domain, you risk nuking your SEO history. This must be managed with military precision (301 redirects, schema updates).
Customer Confidence: Your existing clients need to know you haven't been bought out or changed management.
The process that prevents internal politics
Rebranding projects often die in the "I don't like blue" phase.
Subjective opinions are the enemy of effective branding. To prevent internal politics, we move the conversation from "Taste" to "Performance."
We do not ask: "Do you like this design?" We ask: "Does this design differentiate us from Competitor X? Does it appeal to Persona Y? Is it legible on mobile?"
By establishing clear success metrics upfront, we remove the ego. The Creative Director isn't guessing; they are executing a strategy that everyone agreed on.
Launch without losing momentum
A rebrand is a shock to the system. You need to manage the transition so you don't confuse your loyalists.
Sequence your launch. Do not just flip a switch.
The Website: This is the source of truth. It goes first.
The Touchpoints: Update your invoices, email signatures, and proposals. These are the boring items that build trust.
The Campaign: Only after the foundation is solid do you shout about it on LinkedIn.
A successful rebrand shouldn't feel like a surprise party. It should feel like an evolution—the inevitable next step for a company that has outgrown its old skin.